<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>weedforneed.com &#187; sinsemilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weedforneed.com/tag/sinsemilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weedforneed.com</link>
	<description>Weed for your need (all about cannabis growing, marijuana, weed, hash etc)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Super-Marijuana “Kush/Skunk” story</title>
		<link>http://weedforneed.com/2009/11/the-super-marijuana-%e2%80%9ckushskunk%e2%80%9d-story/</link>
		<comments>http://weedforneed.com/2009/11/the-super-marijuana-%e2%80%9ckushskunk%e2%80%9d-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kanaman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzzwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Drug Intelligence Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes & Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sinsemilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-weed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marijuanacannabis.wordpress.com/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


 In the  US, it seems  that the word ‘Kush’ is about as meaningful as ‘Skunk’ is in the  UK.
That is, the two terms are applied to most indoor weed that’s sold for  profit, and both names are used to suggest that the cannabis being sold is  highly potent, rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5933279406877528";
/* 468x15, created 6/3/09 */
google_ad_slot = "2655424634";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 15;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></center></-> <p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1078" title="kush" src="http://weedforneed.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/kush.jpg" alt="kush" width="213" height="299" />In the  US, it seems  that the word ‘Kush’ is about as meaningful as ‘Skunk’ is in the  UK.</p>
<p>That is, the two terms are applied to most indoor weed that’s sold for  profit, and both names are used to suggest that the cannabis being sold is  highly potent, rather than to indicate any particular genetic heritage. Before  being adopted as the strain-name buzzwords of the moment, both “Skunk” and  “Kush” were fairly strictly defined strains, with clear breeding or geographical  origins.</p>
<p>More worryingly, when the buzzwords of the youth or underground  cultures seep into the mainstream, they get picked up by the hysterical MSM and  turned into the latest scare story.</p>
<p>No doubt, all of the forum’s British  members will be aware of the garbage that’s written and broadcast about “Skunk”  in Blightly – as if it’s some new, child-incinerating  super-weed that just dropped out of the sky, rather than a fairly common,  medium-to-high potency strain that’s been around for at least 30  years.</p>
<p>What’s especially nauseating about this claim what it tacitly  suggests. Most members of the current establishment  (government and media) have personal experience of consuming cannabis, in their  ‘experimental student days’ or whatever. The subtext of the “new, super-potent  weed” claim is that, in hindsight, the harmless old ‘natural’ cannabis of their  youth was actually fine after all (as was the hashish of the times, apparently,  despite it being orders of magnitude more powerful than today, but that’s  another story).</p>
<p>No matter that thousands were deprived of their liberty  due to the draconian laws covering old-timey, harmless  ‘natural’ cannabis in the 60s and 70s, it turns out that version of the demon  weed was fine and harmless. Mistakes were made.<br />
But this <strong>new</strong> “Skunk” weed … that really <strong>does </strong>live up to all the fantasies that were  spread back then, about the stuff we now know to be harmless.</p>
<p>Anyway, it  seems American prohibitionists have embraced the tactic of defining slightly  more potent cannabis as a different drug deserving of even greater and more  ridiculous penalties</p>
<p>As might be expected, US lawmakers have taken it to  the next level.</p>
<p><strong>Kirk and Law  Enforcement: Super-Marijuana “</strong><strong>Kush</strong><strong>” Hits Suburbs</strong><br />
Monday,  15 June 2009</p>
<p>CHICAGO – U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk, Lake County  Metropolitan Enforcement Group Director Larry Lindenman, Waukegan Police Chief Artis Yancey and representatives from Lake County Sheriff  Mark Curran’s office today unveiled tougher penalties for a new type of  “super-marijuana” hitting the northern suburbs.   “Kush,” street slang for a strain  of highly-potent marijuana, has a tretrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of  at least 20 percent.   According to the National  Drug Intelligence  Center,  the THC average of seized marijuana was less than 10 percent in 2007.  In the early 1990s, THC levels were less than  4 percent.</p>
<p>“According to the National Survey on Drug Use  and Health, more than 25 million individuals age 12 and older used marijuana in  2007 – significantly more than any other drug,” Congressman Mark Kirk said.   “That’s why Kush and other high-potency marijuana strains are so worrying.  Local law enforcement reports that  Kush users are ‘zombie-like’ because of the extreme  THC levels.  Drug dealers know they can make as  much money selling Kush as cocaine but without the  heavier sentences that accompany crack and cocaine trafficking.  Higher fines  and longer sentences aren’t the total solution to our nation’s drug problem.   But our laws should keep pace with advances in the strength and cash-value of  high-THC marijuana.  If you can make as  much money selling pot as cocaine, you should face the same  penalties.”</p>
<p>The rise of Kush mirrors the increasing  popularity of high-THC marijuana, which has become more accessible with the rise  of hydroponics.  Drug growers are able to strictly control light, temperature  and humidity and can cross-breed to maximize THC content.  It takes growers  approximately four months from planting to harvest to produce the high-potency  marijuana.  Other types of Kush are known as Bubba,  Paris, Bubble Gum,  Sour and Orange Kush.</p>
<p>According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement  Administration, Kush has been known to sell for as high as <em>$600 per ounce – creating the same profit potential as crack  cocaine. </em>(Er.. really?)</p>
<p>Kirk’s legislation, the High-Potency Marijuana  Sentencing Enhancement Act of 2009 (H.R. 2828), increases federal fines and  sentences for the distribution of high-potency marijuana.  It defines  high-potency marijuana as marijuana with a THC content of 15 percent or more.   The legislation targets drug trafficking only and not possession of  marijuana.</p>
<p>Under current law, unlawful distribution, possession with  intent to distribute, manufacture, importation and exportation of marijuana  under 50 kilograms or 1 to 49 plants carries a maximum fine of $250,000 for an  individual, $1 million for a group and up to five years in prison.  H.R. 2828  increases maximum fines to $1 million for an individual and $5 million for a  group, with a maximum sentence of 25 years.  If death or serious bodily injury  occurs, sentencing would be 20 years to life in prison.</p>
<p>A second offense after a drug felony conviction would result in a  minimum fine of<em> $2 million for an individual or $10 million for a group, with a  maximum sentence of 35 years, or life if death or serious bodily injury resulted  from the use of the marijuana.</em></p>
<!-- Adsense Immediately! V1 beta -->
<!-- Post[count: 2] -->
<div class="adsense adsense-leadout" style="text-align:center;margin: 12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5933279406877528";
/* 468x60, created 7/31/09 weedforneed */
google_ad_slot = "5471455997";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weedforneed.com/2009/11/the-super-marijuana-%e2%80%9ckushskunk%e2%80%9d-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
